Thursday, June 30, 2022

Fixing the primary care system after the COVID-19 pandemic

Nothing in the U.S. health care system will be or should be the same after a two-year global pandemic. Our primary care system has recovered in some ways from the sudden financial shock and the loss of patients, but a closer look suggests it is still the same under-performing, under-funded, and under-cared-for prepandemic system. That needs to change over the next five years. Here is a blueprint detailing how.


Goal 1 Transform the Way Health Care Treats the Primary Care Workforce


We knew that doctors, nurses and pretty much all other primary care workers were overworked and burned out prior to the pandemic. The pandemic made it worse. Things like burnout and job dissatisfaction do not get better on their own. Health care employers will have to radically alter how they view and treat their workforce. In business, successful companies apply a concept called “talent management,” which involves a sustained and holistic approach to recruiting, motivating and retaining workers. It forces organizations to become desirable places to work. It also involves employers seeing their employees as individuals with unique needs, wants and situations. To achieve this goal, primary care employers must move beyond compensation as the chief human resource focus for physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and nurses, and work on meeting the full range of their workplace needs. Employers must redesign health care jobs and work settings with this in mind.

Goal 2 Allow Patient Choice to Drive the Primary Care Marketplace More, Not Less


Patient choice was never really taken seriously in primary care before the pandemic. But it must be taken seriously now. For example, the inconveniences that still exist in trying to schedule, get to and follow up on primary care provider visits are unacceptable. Patients want choices for when and how they access their primary care. They want low-cost options, virtual and in-person options, easy access and convenience, and real-time communication. Primary care providers and their offices need to embrace digital health tools and a new mindset that regards patients as their customers. Virtual primary care delivery, which has fallen off dramatically since the height of the pandemic, should become more mainstream than it is now, especially for certain diagnoses and for patients with already established relationships with primary care providers. Electronic patient care portals must be more interactive, operate in real time, and be designed with input from the user, the patient, on how they wish to use them. Most patient portals remain asynchronous, lack interoperability, and are limited in their functionality from the consumer side.

Patients should have 24/7 access to their primary care provider’s office, not just nine-to-five access. That’s a mindset change as much as anything else, and primary care doctors know it. Yes, payment will need to account for some of this extra access and time by providers (see below), but payment cannot be used anymore as an excuse. Physician-centric primary care as we know it will continue to decline unless patients have more choice in how they wish it to be organized and delivered to them. Primary care physicians will continue to lose relevance with their customers if they do not deliver on the choice imperative.

Goal 3 Stop Big Delivery Systems From Making Primary Care a “Loss Leader”


Big delivery systems that continue to spread weedlike throughout the U.S. treat primary care as something beneath them––a loss leader important mainly for stopping patient “leakage” to outside specialists and other delivery systems with whom they compete. These systems, most with hospitals and powerful specialty groups at their core, must be forced to take primary care delivery more seriously in letting their primary care providers, and not their specialists, manage more of the chronic disease and preventive needs of their patients. They need to make their brand of primary care less transactional and corporate-like, and more relational and human. They need to be incentivized or forced to focus on keeping their patients healthier. In a best-case scenario, there should be more free-standing primary care offices that are not so closely aligned economically with these large hospital-based systems. This falls on individual primary care doctors to make happen and on government and venture capital to help seed fund it. Collaboration with tech companies that can provide digital health tools for these stand-alone practices at reduced cost is also a good idea.

Goal 4 Give Payment Control to the Primary Care Provider and Patient


We have been saying for decades how we need to invest more in primary care and keeping people healthy. But it really has not happened. Call it value-based reimbursement, bundled payment, global capitation, whatever—the words no longer matter. They are the toothless, feel-good vocabulary of an army of policy makers and industry executives who have been unable to see the follies of an approach to fixing primary care payment that depends on providers creating reams of documentation; moving through authoritarian quality checklists for every type of visit and patient; reading and reacting to a mass of analytics about how they should take care of their patients; and being chastised constantly for falling short per some half-evidence-based clinical guideline.

That’s not a good payment system. That’s a Pavlovian one that turns primary care providers into dissatisfied and burned-out lab rats. Move to payment systems that return on-the-ground decision- making and control to the individual provider, payment systems that reflect trust in how they do their jobs. Give providers the freedom to interact with patients how they see fit, and in the process get rid of much of the inane documentation requirements that add no value for either patient or provider. Not everyone needs a detailed checklist to help assure they receive appropriate care. Hold primary care providers accountable but in more global ways that do not require them to justify their decisions for every patient. Push risk onto them but also give them the appropriate amount of funds up front to manage this risk at a population level; don’t dole out the dollars in piecemeal fashion.

Goal 5 Amass an Army of Primary Care Providers at Different Skill Levels


We know there won’t be enough primary care physicians to meet the needs of our system moving forward. But we also face shortages of nurses and medical assistants, both of whom increasingly shoulder more administrative and basic care duties in primary care. Medical schools alone cannot be relied upon to turn out more primary care physicians. They have no incentive to do so.

More initiatives of the kind that Kaiser Permanente has developed, in which they invest in developing primary care physicians, should be encouraged. There needs to be much more loan forgiveness for those wishing to pursue primary care careers. Establishing a plethora of health training programs in community colleges for medical assistants, who now do most of the primary care prep work, makes sense, and reaching into high schools to attract select individuals to such careers can be part of that initiative. Make the employers who need these types of positions invest in the training programs in return for having graduates work locally in their organizations for a period of time.

These are just the big picture strategies, and there is much more to do. But until the overarching blueprint gets articulated and adopted, the tactical details will remain devalued.


15% Off Medical Practice Supplies


VIEW ALL



Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Yellow)


Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Bright Orange)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Yellow)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Blue)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - White)


VIEW ALL

Tuesday, June 28, 2022

Report: Health care facility management, nurse compensation rising

Compensation for health care management and nurses is on the rise, despite persisting staffing issues across the industry.

According to a news release, the 2022 edition of the MGMA DataDive Management and Staff Compensation found that compensation across all management levels rose between 2019 and 2021. Executive positions saw the largest increase, rising 19.73 percent, while senior management saw a more modest 5.07 percent increase. General management saw their compensation increase 4.28 percent over the same period.



The western region of the U.S. saw the largest increase in management pay with executive management positions in that region receiving more than a $23,000 pay raise compared to the eastern region of the country, the lowest increase measured for the position. Meanwhile senior management received more than a $31,000 increase and general management saw a more than $23,000 increase in the western region compared to the southern region, the lowest region for increases for those positions.

The increase wasn’t limited to managers, with some fields of nursing also seeing rises in compensation. Triage nurses saw the largest increase of 13.91 percent between 2019 and 2021 and licensed practical nurses seeing the second largest jump with 7.09 percent over the same time period, the release says.

Meanwhile, productivity continues to suffer as the health care industry experiences a lingering staffing shortage even as the COVID-19 pandemic continues to subside. As of November, 30 percent of medical groups saw themselves coming in below their 2021 productivity goals for 2021, according to the release.

"Today's surge in demand for workers has created a compensation arms race forcing medical practices to revisit the ways in which they recruit, engage and nurture staff," Halee Fischer-Wright, MD, MMM, FAAP, FACMPE, president and chief executive officer at Medical Group Management Association, said in the release. "To stay competitive, medical practice leaders must stay on the pulse of macroeconomic forces and invest in strategies that create rewarding and fulfilling workplaces. This latest data provides invaluable compensation benchmarks for job titles throughout a medical group practice — from the C-suite to the front desk — to help healthcare practices overcome retention and recruitment challenges."


15% Off Medical Practice Supplies


VIEW ALL



Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Yellow)


Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Bright Orange)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Yellow)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Blue)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - White)


VIEW ALL

The roast and the pan: Implications for healthcare

Neil Baum, MD



One day after school, a young girl noticed that her mom was cutting off the ends of a pot roast before putting it in the oven to cook for dinner. She had seen her mom do this many times before but had never asked her why. She asked, and her mom said, "I don't know why I cut the ends off, but it's what my mom always did. Why don't you ask your Grandma?"

So, the young girl asked her grandmother, and Grandma said, "I don't know. That's just the way my mom always cooked it. Why don't you ask her? The young girl called her great grandmother, who was living in a nursing home and asked her the same question, and she replied, "I cut off the ends of the pot roast because that's what my mother did." And she did not say it because it makes the meat juicier. She said, "When I was first married, we had a tiny oven, and the pot roast didn't fit in the oven unless I cut the ends off." Or, in other words, she said that's how we do it here, which was passed down for nearly three generations.

What are examples of using too small a pan for your roast in your practice?

Having been in practice for more than 40 years, I have witnessed several areas where we tend to behave and perform actions and behavior on our patients just like they've been done before.



Example 1. Treatment of uncomplicated UTI (no fever, chills, or flank pain) with a 7–10 day course of antibiotics. Studies have clearly shown that a short course of antibiotic therapy, i.e., 1-3 days, is just as effective in eradicating symptoms with fewer side effects than the longer course of treatment.

Example 2. Symptomatic treatment of URI without antibiotics. Since 1946 when Dr. Benjamin Spock wrote his book on childcare, Dr. Benjamin Spock's Baby and Child Care, hundreds of thousands of pediatric patients have received antibiotics for a viral infection. It wasn't until the 1990s that it was appropriate to counsel parents that most URIs are viral infections and self-limiting and require only symptomatic treatment and not antibiotics.

Example 3. For several decades most physicians allocated 15-minutes for each patient. This was the standard operating procedure for most offices. Now it is more efficient to identify the reason the patient is coming to the office and schedule a time that is most appropriate for that visit. For example, if a patient is coming to check their blood pressure and blood cholesterol level, that visit is approximately 5-minutes. However, if a patient is coming for a new visit to discuss the result of a biopsy that revealed cancer, then 30 minutes might be more appropriate.

Here's my question or request for the readers of this blog: do we need to swab the antecubital space with alcohol before phlebotomy? I advocate that unless a patient is immune-compromised or using chronic steroid medication, wiping the skin with alcohol, which burns and increases the pain associated with phlebotomy, then alcohol is not a requirement. I was interested in performing a study with patients receiving an alcohol swab before phlebotomy vs. a saline\sterile water swab and comparing the pain and erythema or any other adverse events when only saline or water cleansed the skin before phlebotomy. I know this is a minor issue, but it serves as an example of using old-fashioned methods or a too-small pan for the roast placed in the oven. It would be nice for multiple practices to look at this antiquated tradition and demonstrate that this is an example of a roast too big for the proverbial pan used for centuries. Anyone interested in pursuing this study, please let me hear from you.

Bottom Line: Every practice has archaic methods and procedures being performed or conducted in our practices and on our patients that need to be modified or even removed. We don't have to look very far to identify those roasts that don't fit the roast pan. I agree that sometimes they are small changes, but more significant improvements will soon follow when you start with minor changes. I am eager to hear from your opinions or comments. (doctorwhiz@gmail.com)


15% Off Medical Practice Supplies


VIEW ALL



Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Yellow)


Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Bright Orange)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Yellow)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Blue)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - White)


VIEW ALL