Wednesday, July 31, 2024

Adults with chronic pain tend to have increased anxiety and depression

A University of Arizona Health Sciences study found a significant correlation between chronic pain and increased symptoms of anxiety and depression among U.S. adults. The research, published in the journal PAIN, reveals that despite experiencing higher rates of mental health issues, adults with chronic pain access mental health care at lower rates and are less likely to have their mental health needs met in treatment.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 51.6 million U.S. adults experienced chronic pain in 2021. The study indicates that while individuals with chronic pain constitute 20.4% of the adult population, they represent an estimated 55.5% of adults with clinically significant anxiety and depression symptoms.

“The mental health movement in the United States has been extremely successful, and many people are living better lives as a result,” said Jennifer S. De La Rosa, lead author of the study and strategy director for the U of A Health Sciences Comprehensive Center for Pain & Addiction, which funded the research. “Yet among those whose mental health needs haven’t yet been effectively addressed, the experience of chronic pain is not the exception, it is the rule. The needs of people with chronic pain are too often left out of our national mental health conversation. Our findings suggest that meaningful engagement with the lived experiences of those with chronic pain should be a focus of our national mental health agenda going forward.”

Building on previous research from the Comprehensive Center for Pain & Addiction, which found that one in 20 U.S. adults suffer from a combination of chronic pain and anxiety or depression symptoms, this new study examined the extent to which individuals with chronic pain access and benefit from mental health treatment.

Analyzing data from 31,997 participants in the National Health Interview Survey, the research team identified chronic pain-related disparities in three areas: the need for mental health treatment, the use of mental health treatment, and the success of treating anxiety and depression symptoms when treatment is used.

Key findings of the study include:
  • 43.2% of adults living with chronic pain, approximately 21.5 million people, have a mental health need, compared to 17.4% of adults without chronic pain.
  • Chronic pain is associated with a 40.3% reduction in the odds of using mental health treatment among those with mental health needs.
  • Only 44.4% of people with chronic pain, an estimated 9.5 million, used mental health services and had their symptoms adequately treated, compared to 71.5% of those without chronic pain.
  • Adults with chronic pain are more than twice as likely as others to experience continuing anxiety or depression symptoms even when receiving mental health treatment.

“For those with chronic pain, the narrative about what needs to be done to address mental health is qualitatively different than for those who don't have chronic pain,” said De La Rosa. “Improving health care for people with chronic pain includes not only connecting people to care but also addressing a disproportionate failure to achieve relief, even in the context of caregiving.”

15% Off Medical Practice Supplies


VIEW ALL



Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Yellow)


Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Bright Orange)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Yellow)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Blue)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - White)


VIEW ALL




Monday, July 29, 2024

Is remote care the future of preventive care?

Access to health care is in crisis and it’s getting worse.

The 2024 Philips Future Health Index, a global survey of 3,000 health care leaders in 14 countries, encapsulates the problem. Among the findings:
  • 81% of leaders said delays in care are an issue at their organization, whether due to longer waits for appointments and treatments, or reduced access to services
  • 69% reported increased waiting lists for appointments
  • 62% said time with patients is reduced
  • 49% reported a decreased capacity to meet the needs of underserved communities

The causes for lack of access in the U.S. are many: a growing shortage of clinicians, particularly at the primary care level; rural hospital closings; health care system mergers; barriers presented by social determinants of health (SDoH) such as poverty, food scarcity, lack of transportation, housing instability; and more.

Decreased access to care and resources hurts community health at large as well as individual patients, particularly those with chronic conditions who require more care overall, including monitoring, education and reinforcement of treatment plans. Accessibility for specialty care is also impacted, where wait times can be even longer for initial visits, consultations and follow-up care. Shortages of specialty clinicians in rural parts of the country make it even harder for a big part of the population to get the care they need.

The lack of access, particularly at the primary level, is delaying health care’s long-awaited switch to value-based care, a model largely built on enhanced primary and preventative care. It calls on primary care providers (PCPs) to take a more active role in their patients’ health, not only treating specific conditions and illnesses but guiding them on a path toward wellness.

With access to routine, specialty and emergency care already restricted, improving preventative care can seem like a lower priority. In fact, maximizing preventative care should be a top goal because it improves outcomes, reduces the demand for more urgent care, saves money and relieves the burden on primary care practices and organizations.

But how to improve preventative care? The country is not miraculously going to be able to add the tens of thousands of additional PCPs it needs or double the capacity of current providers. The answer lies elsewhere. Specifically, it can be found in remote care services, including remote patient monitoring and chronic care management, both of which can offer opportunities for early intervention and reduce the need for in-person visits, unnecessary hospitalizations or emergency department visits, freeing clinicians and staff from non-critical and routine tasks to provide needed care.


How remote care helps


The adult population with chronic diseases is growing. In most cases, these patients require monitoring and preventative care to keep their conditions from worsening. However, the burden of checking for and reporting worsening symptoms often falls to the patients themselves. Remote care makes it possible for clinicians to check on these patients and detect abnormal patterns that patients might miss, allowing for early intervention.

Traditionally, much of preventative care has required in-person visits with a provider, which can be difficult to schedule. Long intervals between appointments and tests increase the chances that a patient’s condition will worsen, requiring more intensive care. Regular remote monitoring of key health indicators, such as glucose levels for patients with diabetes, identifies problems before they become serious, allowing providers to intervene in time to stave off an emergency.

Remotely monitored patients become active participants in their care. Rather than being involved only when they’re at the doctor’s office, or experiencing symptoms, they can access their data through patient portals and mobile apps from remote care partners. The regular feedback and constant generation of data makes them more of a collaborator in their own care and can encourage them to make better choices about their lifestyles and health.

Remote care allows providers to develop personalized goals associated with their treatment plans that are integrated into care plans for patients based on their individualized needs and data obtained. A tailored plan makes it easier for providers to deliver targeted adjustments and interventions to these plans based on real-time information delivered through remote devices. Medication and treatment can be modified as soon as it’s needed without waiting for an annual appointment or medical crisis.

And the benefits aren’t limited to patients. With time-intensive monitoring delegated to a remote care partner, overworked and undermanned primary care offices will become more efficient and able to focus on providing in-person care. Increased preventative care delivered remotely will result in better overall health for the patient base.

In addition to improving outcomes for patients, early detection through remote care saves health care providers money. Preventing the worsening of a disease is less expensive than treating it. For example, intervening when a remote monitor identifies signs of fluid retention in a patient with congestive heart failure (CHF), a provider managing the patient in the office or at home is more cost efficient than treating the patient for a CHF exacerbation in the hospital because it requires far fewer resources, including provider time, medical equipment, a hospital room, potential complications, etc.


The human touch


Those who don’t understand modern remote care sometimes dismiss it as “medicine by machine,” little more than monitors checking vital signs and feeding data into a distant computer. In fact, remote care can be more personal than occasional in-person care. Nurses and other staffers at remote care companies regularly interact with patients, educating them about their conditions, answering their questions, responding to alarms and providing encouragement.

The bond they can form with their remote caregivers can incentivize patients to take better care of themselves, just knowing that someone is checking the information and will be “watching” over them. Ideally, remote care company nurses should be in the same community as the patients they monitor. This allows them to connect disadvantaged patients to local resources, such as transportation services, food banks, translators, etc.

Providing remote care through a trusted partner is an effective way for primary care practices and providers to deliver preventative care to patients, relieve the problem of access and reduce the demand for their services.

15% Off Medical Practice Supplies


VIEW ALL



Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Yellow)


Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Bright Orange)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Yellow)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Blue)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - White)


VIEW ALL




Thursday, July 25, 2024

The case for transitioning to value-based care

Momentum for value-based care grows as physicians gain more experience with value-based models and commit to improving outcomes – rewarding patients and providers alike. Investing in value-based care allows physicians to spend more time with their patients and, in doing so, deliver high-quality care that takes patients’ needs and preferences into consideration. Patients, providers and payers see the benefits of this approach, but deciding on the appropriate model and making the transition can present a significant undertaking for physician practices. Some providers are understandably hesitant. However, the potential return on investment in cost savings, care quality and physician satisfaction provides a strong business case for practices to consider making the switch—and they don’t have to go through this transformation alone.


Increasing cost savings


By improving outcomes for patients and prioritizing preventive care, value-based care models can lead to cost savings for practices and the Medicare program. Accountable care organizations (ACOs) share savings with the Medicare program in the form of performance payments, and so far, the results have been promising. ACOs have generated more than $21 billion in gross savings for Medicare over the last decade, and physicians participating in advanced alternative payment models earned $644 million in bonus payments in 2022.


Collaborative Health Systems


At Collaborative Health Systems, our provider partners achieved $26.3 million in total savings to Medicare through the Medicare Shared Savings Program in 2022. Providers can use these savings to further invest in and grow their practices to better serve their communities. Most importantly, when physician practices and the Medicare program save, those savings are passed on to our patients through lower costs.


Addressing physician burnout


An annual Medical Economics report identified burnout as one of the top four issues facing physicians, a trend that is exacerbated by the bureaucratic tasks associated with practicing medicine. On average, up to 25% of a physician’s time is spent on administrative duties as “desktop medicine” – the amount of time a physician spends in front of a computer after seeing patients – which cuts into the time available for face-to-face patient care.

The shift toward outcomes-driven care can also help address some of the factors contributing to burnout. It puts more emphasis on coordinated and preventive care and aligns with the values that physicians often have, including driving higher-quality care and connecting with patients on a more personal level than what is possible under the current volume-driven model. With access to timely data and tailored, actionable insights, physicians can focus their energy and efforts where it matters most – serving their patients. Making the transition can seem overwhelming, but partners and resources are available to support practices and their staff as they move away from volume-driven care.


Driving quality improvement


By placing an emphasis on outcomes, data-driven decision-making and reducing unnecessary care, value-based care models incentivize providers to be intentional and proactive about the care they provide for their patients. Physicians participating in independent practice associations, another type of value-based care model, provide more care management services for patients with chronic conditions. Similarly, value-based Medicare Advantage models are proven to provide better, more efficient patient care, including reduced hospital admissions and emergency room visits, compared with fee-for-service Medicare. Two-thirds of provider practices in a recent survey agree value-based models lead to better quality care than other models, and ACOs outperform fee-for-service models on 81% of quality measures, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. By prioritizing collaboration, coordination and outcomes, these models improve the patient experience as well by ensuring the care they receive is truly comprehensive and patient centered.


The future of value-based care


While transitioning to value-based care may require up-front investments in infrastructure and care delivery transformation, the potential long-term benefit to care quality, costs and physician wellness serves as a compelling business case for physician practices. Adoption of value-based care continues to accelerate, and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation has set a goal to shift 100% of Medicare beneficiaries into an accountable care relationship by 2030, further cementing this model as the future of patient care. Physicians who are not yet part of a value-based arrangement should evaluate how their practice and patients could benefit and begin taking necessary steps, or risk getting left behind in this moment of health care transformation.

15% Off Medical Practice Supplies


VIEW ALL



Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Yellow)


Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Bright Orange)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Yellow)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Blue)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - White)


VIEW ALL