Sunday, July 3, 2022

Teaching health centers score $155M in grants for resident training in primary care

Federal grants totaling $155 million will support 72 teaching health centers with high need primary care medical and dental residency programs, including psychiatry.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced the awards, with money coming from the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 and federal fiscal year 2022 funds through through HHS’ Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). The grants are part of President Joe Biden’s “Unity Agenda” to address mental health and come as the nation’s physicians and support staff deal with high levels of burnout, according to HHS.



“Having access to primary care and mental health support is essential to one’s health and well-being,” HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra said in a statement. “Increasing the number of primary care residents training in community health centers and other outpatient community clinics is a key part of the Biden-Harris Administration’s plan to address longstanding health inequities in our most vulnerable communities. We will continue to expand the primary care workforce supply line to help meet community needs.”

HRSA’s Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education program focuses on supporting residents in primary care residency training programs to meet the medical and mental health care needs of rural and underserved communities. With more than 970 full-time residents, it represents an important step toward increasing much-needed access to quality health care services, according to HHS.

The money will pay for training in family medicine, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, psychiatry, pediatrics, general dentistry and geriatrics.

“We are leading the effort to build a stronger primary care and mental health workforce to meet the needs of historically underserved communities by supporting primary care training programs that include psychiatry,” HRSA Administrator Carole Johnson said in the news release. “The American Rescue Plan has been a game-changer for growing this critical program and helping us build a workforce that best reflects and serves the communities that need these resources the most.”


15% Off Medical Practice Supplies


VIEW ALL



Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Yellow)


Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Bright Orange)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Yellow)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Blue)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - White)


VIEW ALL

Saturday, July 2, 2022

Celebrating Freedom: Regain, Retain or Attain Your Independence as a Concierge Physician

As we commemorate our country’s long-ago fight for freedom this Fourth of July, it’s an appropriate time to recognize the more subtle battle being fought to preserve physician autonomy in our country. In a landscape that’s come to be dominated by health systems and physician-employed models, caring for patients in an independent practice is rapidly becoming another victim of the big box era.

In 1983, 76% of doctors were self-employed. Today, according to the Physicians Advocacy Institute (PIA), almost three quarters of U.S. doctors now work for hospitals, health systems, payors and other corporate entities. While the healthcare industry has been inexorably moving toward this outcome for some time, the pandemic unquestionably accelerated it into fast forward mode. For instance, in the past three years, PIA reports an 11% increase in the number of hospital-employed physicians. Digging deeper into the data only points to the strength of the trend, as the majority of doctors employed by hospitals are under the age of 40.

I’m not suggesting we turn back the clock or pursue models that may no longer be sustainable in today’s volatile medical environment, which is still recovering from the impact of COVID-19. But I am urging all involved in healthcare to consider what’s being lost by abandoning the privilege of practicing independently.

“I fear what will happen to the healthcare system when insurance companies have free reign and hospitals/large organizations are making guidelines for patient care. No one will care for patients like a solo doctor will. My patients are like my family. Private practice may be in the decline, but we never needed caring people more.” – Linda Girgis, MD, Editor, Physician’s Weekly, 5.2.22

There is much at stake in recognizing and rewarding the enormous value of this type of care before it disappears irretrievably. It’s why we believe so fervently in our company’s work to transition independent practitioners to the concierge medicine model as a genuine solution. The effect is exponential, with tens of thousands of patients of our Specialdocs physicians reaping the benefits of personalized care each year, a number that continues to rise.



“If you want to be a primary care physician today in a traditional fee-for-service model, you have to limit the time you’re seeing patients so you see enough people in a day that the employer will keep you on. I need to guide my patients through the stages of their lives in a way they feel I’m marching in step with them. With concierge medicine, I can pursue my passion without worrying my livelihood or family will be harmed. I’m able to be patient-focused now and I never would have been able to say that before.” – Adam Rubinstein, MD, Specialdocs concierge physician

Lack of autonomy is a major contributor to physician burnout, still reported at unacceptably high levels of 48-51% for those in family practice or internal medicine in the most recent Medscape survey. Even the most well-intentioned programs to address burnout can’t work without that crucial element, which acknowledges each doctor’s driving desire to choose how to care for their patients and for themselves. It’s not surprising that the survey also showed solo doctors in an office-based practice setting were significantly less likely to experience burnout than colleagues at hospitals or healthcare organizations.

For an independent concierge physician, the differences are profound. They are free from the need to supply endless documentation, concerns over lower reimbursement rates and the ability to meet overhead expenses, and the steady drumbeat of worry over ever-increasing, superficial patient visits required to meet basic income needs.

As a long-time advocate of concierge medicine, I’ve seen how the membership model opens previously shut doors by restoring the time for physicians to pursue personal passions, whether that’s exploring advanced research and promising new technology or mentoring the next generation of doctors. Most importantly, a concierge physician has the opportunity to attain an exceedingly rare work-life balance, becoming immeasurably enriched by time spent with partners, family, friends and community.

Our Specialdocs clients, like many who choose concierge medicine, are a fiercely and proudly independent group of physicians who frequently use words like “grateful,” “joyful” and “rejuvenated” to describe their post-transition mindset. This Fourth of July, we celebrate the reason we established Specialdocs 20 years ago, and what will always define our path going forward: preserving a physician’s right to practice medicine inspired by their own deeply felt vision of care.

A happy Independence Day to all!


15% Off Medical Practice Supplies


VIEW ALL



Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Yellow)


Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Bright Orange)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Yellow)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Blue)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - White)


VIEW ALL

Friday, July 1, 2022

Unexpected surprises in the No Surprises Act: How medical practices should respond

The No Surprises Act (NSA) has been in effect since January 1 to protect patients against an estimated 12 million surprise bills this year. Yet, while the goals of consumer protection, price transparency, and cost concessions are important and necessary, the legislation is starting to present real challenges to practices’ financial stability.

Fulfilling the new regulations places additional burden on practices’ already tight time and labor resources. For practices to survive without further unexpected surprises, they must act quickly.

New Jersey Brain and Spine, a subspecialty neurosurgery practice located in Northern New Jersey, has been closely monitoring and adjusting to the No Surprises Act legislation. “We firmly believe in the need to protect patients from surprise medical bills,” said neurosurgeon Reza Karimi, MD, of New Jersey Brain and Spine. “The law does place additional burdens on practices like ours, including new expenses for added billing paperwork, legal consulting and hiring an arbitration specialist. We have been focused on putting the right structures in place.”

Protections for patients—and for practices


Providers would be wise to consider the legislation from two angles: protection and growth. For patients, protection means no surprise billing; for practices, it means preventing violations and preparing for arbitration.

In essence, the No Surprises Act prohibits out-of-network providers from billing patients more than a payer’s applicable in-network cost sharing amount, known as balance billing. If this happens, providers risk a penalty of up to $10,000 per violation. To protect themselves, providers must now be ready to:Provide a good faith estimate (GFE) of expected charges and diagnostic codes within one to three business days after an item or service is scheduled.
Submit any surprise out-of-network bill directly to the patient’s health plan, ideally with self-identified determinations of whether No Surprises Act protections apply.
Notify patients of their protections by posting information prominently at the location of the facility, posting it on a public website, and via a one-page handout.

Never ask patients to waive their rights for emergency services or certain non-emergency services, nor appear in any way to coerce a patient to do so.

The most significant area in which practices must start to protect themselves will likely be the new Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process, a strictly regulated baseball-style arbitration for contesting unreasonable reimbursement amounts with insurers. Physicians will not only need to become savvy at submitting bids to receive more favorable reimbursements but also because the loser in the arbitration may be required to cover fees for both parties.

John Abrahams, MD, physician and president of Brain & Spine Surgeons of New York, said his practice took drastic steps to prepare for the arbitration process. “We went through about 5,000 cases of our lumbar and cervical fusions over the past eight years. We documented lengths of stay, readmissions, and outcomes over three, six and 12 months,” Dr. Abrahams said. “It was a Herculean effort, but we felt we had to do it because we don't know what we're going to be compared to moving forward.”

Will the No Surprises Act help or hinder growth?


Whether the law will allow physicians, especially those who take call or provide emergency care, to grow their practices under their current business models remains to be seen. That’s because the cost of achieving and sustaining NSA compliance and retaining legal counsel may overtake revenue from reimbursements.

If a portion of a provider’s revenue stream now moves to just above Medicare reimbursement levels, it will be difficult for practices to stay viable. There are a few options to combat this, and all require additional time or money or both before they generate ROI: Increasing volume, negotiating with more insurers to go in-network, and adding ancillary services, although those services may also be regulated by the NSA.

Another issue impacting growth is the uncertainty around the IDR process, as the rules keep changing. Early this year, several state medical associations and air ambulance companies filed suits about the interim final rule that bases appropriate reimbursements on insurers’ qualifying payment amounts (QPA). In April, 2022, CMS retracted its stance on just how much weight QPAs should carry in arbitrators’ decision making.

Still unclear, too, is whether state or federal mandates will be used to determine appropriate reimbursement amounts. “If we have state-based plans going over to federal arbitration guidelines, and if the federal arbitration guidelines are very unfavorable, we will have to make some potentially drastic changes to the way we practice,” Dr. Karimi noted. “Everything comes down to the federal IDR process.”

Steps practices should take to prepare


Domenic Segalla, Healthcare Market Leader, Principal at Withum Advisory Services, which provides advisory, tax and audit services to hospitals and physicians, says practices first need to ensure they have a firm understanding of the regulations and their potential financial repercussions.

“We have been working with medical practices to estimate the potential financial impact this law could have on them as well as developing workflows to manage the appeals process,” he said. “Many physicians still need education on this law and what’s coming down the pike.”

Practices should begin taking the following steps to limit any negative impacts of the No Surprises Act:Track the data. Data analytics are now more important than ever. Make the effort to start building case data to prove a track record. Gather data for each case on complications and readmissions. Reach out to hospitals to gather length-of-stay data. Ideally, as a provider collects more data his or her outcomes can be compared to published national norms.
Promote quality via marketing. Physicians must continually market the quality of their care through practice statistics, patient stories, blogs, public relations, and social media. This substantiates a provider’s ability and availability to referring physicians while establishing a record of quality and expertise in the public domain. It also helps create a groundswell of patient demand that can motivate insurers to negotiate a competitive in-network contract and increase volume.
Focus on outcomes. In addition to quality measures, IDR arbitrators can consider factors including the experience and training of the provider. The physician is allowed to present this type of information at arbitration to justify a higher payment than the QPA. The physician can also present data showing that his or her outcomes for the case or disease are superior to the norms as well as how its data has helped the practice improve efficiencies and quality controls.
Enlist an advisor. Smart providers will invest in additional labor or outsourcing to manage the new billing and arbitration requirements. That means preparing to invest in legal and workflow advisors who specialize in healthcare and can help providers prepare for the new normal.
Do the math. Physicians must become acutely aware of their own revenue cycles: What they’re getting paid, by whom, payment timeframes, and which procedures are continually denied.

The onus lies on providers and practice administrators to ensure that they understand and prepare for the requirements of the No Surprises Act. It is vital for to proactively evaluate strategies to respond to these market changes and ensure practice health and financial stability.


15% Off Medical Practice Supplies


VIEW ALL



Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Yellow)


Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Bright Orange)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Yellow)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Blue)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - White)


VIEW ALL