That skepticism reflects a misunderstanding of how preventive care actually works. Initial cost increases are not a failure of care management; they are evidence that it is functioning as intended. Preventive care must be evaluated across a multi-year cost curve, not through a single-year snapshot. Its true value appears over time through avoided future costs, stabilized utilization patterns, and improved workforce outcomes.
Why traditional cost metrics fail preventive care
Many employers expect preventive care programs to deliver immediate cost reductions. When early claims increase instead, those programs are often labeled ineffective. That expectation is built on a flawed baseline.
When care is deferred, chronic conditions remain unmanaged, and benefits go unused, making short-term costs appear artificially low. In reality, chronic disease already accounts for the majority of U.S. healthcare spending, largely due to preventable complications. High-risk members frequently avoid preventive care altogether. When engagement improves, previously unaddressed needs surface. Measuring success too early, therefore, leads to false conclusions about program performance.
The preventive care cost curve explained
Preventive care follows a predictable cost curve.
Phase 1: Engagement and discovery
Utilization rises as members begin addressing previously untreated or poorly controlled conditions. Medication adherence improves, and unmet behavioral health needs are identified. Costs increase in the short term because individuals are finally receiving care they have delayed.
Phase 2: Stabilization and behavior change
As conditions are managed more consistently, care becomes less reactive. Emergency department utilization declines, and duplicative or uncoordinated services decrease. Costs plateau as utilization shifts toward more appropriate, lower-acuity settings.
Phase 3: Avoidance and optimization
This is where the financial benefit becomes clear. Prevented hospitalizations, fewer complications, slower disease progression, and reduced catastrophic claims risk begin to influence overall cost trends. Productivity improves, and no-show rates decline. The cost curve bends not because care is restricted, but because risk is addressed earlier and more effectively.
Preventive care management vs. reactive cost control
Restriction-based cost-control models rely on limiting access through prior authorization, narrow networks, or cost shifting. While these approaches may temporarily suppress utilization, they do not change underlying health behaviors. Delayed care inevitably resurfaces as higher-acuity episodes that are more expensive and harder to manage. This short-term “cost control” erodes trust in the healthcare system and discourages individuals from seeking care they need—ultimately driving higher long-term costs.
Preventive care management takes a different approach. It focuses on the root causes of health needs rather than reacting after problems escalate. It reduces unnecessary utilization without cutting off access to care and builds the trust and follow-through required for sustainable behavior change.
Measuring ROI, the right way
Short-term claims reduction alone is an incomplete measure of success. A more accurate view of return on investment includes cost avoidance, risk migration from high- to moderate-risk categories, improved benefit utilization, and reductions in usage of emergency rooms and inpatient settings. Cost avoidance is real, even when it is not immediately visible in year-one claims data.
The role of care management as a benefits quarterback
Employees often struggle to understand which benefits are available or how to use them. At the same time, vendors frequently operate in silos, and HR teams are stretched thin trying to coordinate services. Care management serves as the connective tissue—coordinating care, supporting appointments and referrals, and ensuring benefit investments are utilized.
Human-led care in a tech-enabled world
Advanced analytics and machine learning enhance risk stratification and help identify rising-risk members earlier. Technology strengthens care teams, but it does not replace them. Human relationships remain essential. Trust drives engagement, engagement enables behavior change, and behavior change moderates cost trends. These elements are interconnected and mutually reinforcing.
Special considerations for employers and unions
Unions typically take a longer, generational view of health outcomes, while non-union employers prioritize shorter ROI windows. Preventive care management can work for both, but expectations must be aligned with the appropriate time horizon. The longer the view, the clearer and more durable the return.
What employers should expect in year one
Early success appears as stronger engagement, clearer insight into member risk, and improved care navigation. Members begin answering outreach calls, appointments are scheduled, and conditions move from unmanaged to actively addressed. Financial indicators in the first year may be mixed, but the trajectory becomes increasingly clear.
Reframing cost as an investment
Preventive care management is not designed to reduce costs overnight. When early spending rises, organizations may be tempted to pull back—but doing so simply postpones health needs rather than resolving them. Those needs will reappear later as more complex, higher-cost care. Taking a longer view allows organizations to intervene earlier, when care is more straightforward, outcomes are easier to influence, and costs are more predictable. This is how preventive care ultimately makes healthcare spending easier to manage.
No comments:
Post a Comment