Showing posts with label discrimination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label discrimination. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 12, 2017

Supreme Court declines to hear LGBT job discrimination case

The U.S. Supreme Court [official website] on Monday declined to hear[orders list, PDF] an appeal from Jameka Evans, a Georgia security guard who claims that she was harassed and ultimately forced to quit her job because she is s a lesbian.


Evans argued that sexual orientation discrimination in the workplace violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [text]. Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on a number of factors, including sex. The question presented in the Evans appeal, among other cases, is whether this law covers discrimination based on somebody's sexual orientation. Courts are split on the issue. She was unsuccessful [opinion, PDF] in advancing this claim at the Eleventh Circuit and the US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia [official websites]. The Supreme Court's decision not to hear the case leaves the Eleventh Circuit's ruling in place.


President Obama's Equal Employment Opportunity Commission previously took the view [NYT report] that the act covers discrimination based on sexual orientation. In 2017, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit [official website] ruled the same, in the landmark case Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College [JURIST report]. In that case, Kimberly Hively alleged that she was repeatedly denied promotions and that her part-time contract was not renewed because of her sexual orientation. The court found that, "if discriminating against an employee because she is homosexual is equivalent to discriminating against her because she is (A) a woman who is (B) sexually attracted to women, then it is motivated, in part, by an enumerated trait: the employee's sex." They concluded that this violated Title VII.


President Donald Trump's administration has argued [Reuters report] that Title VII prohibits discrimination based on sex, but not sexual orientation.


Similar cases are in play in lower courts, including a pending Second Circuit case [JURIST report] involving a New York skydiving instructor who alleged he was fired because he was gay.


20% Off

Thursday, October 26, 2017

Discrimination Via Public Utility Monopoly in LaGrange

Discrimination Via Public Utility Monopoly in LaGrange



It’s hard to believe that in the twenty-first century there are still households that face the risk of going without electricity or running water because of who they are and where they come from. But in Georgia, that’s still the case. In LaGrange, a town about an hour southwest of Atlanta, the City is the sole utility service provider and will not provide these basic services to any applicant who cannot provide specific identity documents that are unavailable to many immigrants, including those who are undocumented - and many who are lawfully present.

While the City’s identity document requirements disproportionately hurt Latinos, the City also limits and denies basic utility services to people with unrelated court debt owed to the City, a policy that predominantly harms African-Americans. To deny utility services to people because they cannot provide certain identity documents, or owe the City debt, is both inhumane and in violation of federal law—which is why we went to court.

In May, the Southern Center for Human Rights, the National Immigration Law Center, and the law firm of Relman, Dane and Colfax PLLC filed a lawsuit [complaint, PDF] on behalf of the Georgia NAACP, the Troup County Branch of the NAACP, Project South, and several impacted individuals, challenging two local policies [PDF] that make it incredibly hard, and even impossible, for many residents to keep the lights on and maintain running water in their homes. We are asking the court to permanently block these discriminatory policies.

Both local policies unlawfully restrict access to utility services that are vital to people’s ability to live in LaGrange—including gas, water and electricity—and the overwhelming majority of residents impacted are Black and Latino. Both of these policies put low-income residents of color in an impossible situation—either leave their homes and families in LaGrange or live without basic utilities.

Many of the individuals affected by this first policy are undocumented Latino immigrants who, in order to get water or electricity, must either rent from a landlord who provides the utilities, which seriously limits available housing options, or find a third party willing to open an account for them. The latter practice is criminalized under a current municipal ordinance and could subject the utility user (and the third party) to jail time and fines. Both options make families vulnerable to exploitation.

The policy applies to renters and homeowners alike. But for the kindness of a friend willing to risk prosecution, for example, a Project South member and his wife, and their two young children, would be unable to obtain water or electricity in their home in LaGrange, which they own.

Another resident impacted by this policy is an undocumented man who has lived in LaGrange for more than fifteen years. He lives with his four children in a home that he rents. He can’t obtain utilities from LaGrange in his own name because he does not have a social security number and separate U.S. or state-government-issued photo ID.

Another man lives in LaGrange with his wife and their two young children in a home that they own. He, too, is unable to obtain utilities from the City of LaGrange in his own name because he lacks a social security number and other U.S.- or state government-issued photo ID. His wife is similarly unable to meet the requirements of the discriminatory LaGrange policy.

The second policy we’re challenging adds individuals’ unpaid fines and fees from the LaGrange Municipal Court to their utility bills, and then threatens utility service disconnections if the court debt is not paid. LaGrange residents are often threatened with utility disconnection because of unpaid fines for things like traffic offenses, loitering and petty theft. Some of those convictions are more than ten years old. Most of the individuals affected by this policy are African-American - even though only half of the town’s residents are African-American, more than 90 percent threatened with utility disconnection because of court debt in recent years are African-American.

Many of the individuals affected by these discriminatory policies are on a fixed income, and some rely on electricity for medical treatment. One of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, for example, is an African-American man with disabilities who relies on an oxygen machine to breathe. Yet the City of LaGrange has continually threatened to disconnect his electricity and other utilities, in part, because of court fines stemming from a traffic ticket.

These policies prey upon LaGrange’s most vulnerable residents. They are not only inhumane - they are illegal, too. We are confident the courts will agree.

15% OFF All Products



Pearl Finish Business Card Template


Cream Business Card Template