Showing posts with label telehealth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label telehealth. Show all posts

Monday, April 13, 2026

Keeping telehealth profitable

Telehealth can absolutely make money for a practice, but it usually stops being profitable when it’s treated like a convenient add-on instead of a real service line. The clinics that do well tend to be the ones that define what telehealth is for, build a repeatable workflow around it and stay on top of payer rules that keep changing. If you want a quick “are we doing this right?” gut check, this Physicians Practice piece is a helpful framing device: “Video visits versus virtual care”.


What does “profitable telehealth” actually mean?


In plain terms, you’re collecting more money than it costs to deliver the visit once you account for clinician time, staff support, platform fees, documentation, billing work and the follow-up tasks that can pile up after a virtual encounter. Practices often think the math is working because visit volume is strong, then discover their margin is being quietly eaten by extra “shadow work,” like tech troubleshooting, last-second conversions, and denials tied to small billing details. If that’s your reality, it’s usually worth revisiting the basics and making sure everyone in the practice is playing by the same rules. Physicians Practice has a useful refresher in “Untangling telehealth billing”, and for coding mechanics that come up in real workflows, “Coding for telemedicine visits” can help align staff and clinicians.


Which kinds of telehealth are usually easiest to sustain financially?


The visits that tend to work best are the ones that are predictable, protocol-friendly and clearly appropriate for virtual care. Think follow-ups, medication management, stable chronic care check-ins, and straightforward acute complaints where your clinicians feel confident that a virtual visit is safe and sufficient. Profitability also improves when practices stop treating telehealth as the default “overflow” and instead treat it as a planned option with guardrails.

It’s also worth remembering that some services adjacent to telehealth can support both access and revenue when handled carefully. Patient portal-based e-visits, for example, can be a meaningful part of the mix, but they only help if the documentation matches what you’re billing and the workflow is designed to keep it efficient. Physicians Practice gets into the practical “do this, not that” details in “How to correctly document and bill for patient e-visits”. Remote patient monitoring can be another revenue stream, but it’s also an area where compliance mistakes can erase gains quickly, which is why this Physicians Practice piece is worth keeping on your radar: “Remote patient monitoring under scrutiny: Top compliance mistakes to know”.


What Medicare rules should we watch right now?


If Medicare is a meaningful slice of your payer mix, it helps to keep a short list of “source of truth” pages bookmarked, because the fastest way to lose profitability is to bill confidently under an assumption that is no longer true. CMS maintains the Medicare List of Telehealth Services, which is a practical anchor when you’re trying to confirm whether something is actually considered a Medicare telehealth service. CMS also publishes an updated Telehealth FAQ (CY 2026) that addresses operational questions practices routinely run into. If you want the broader policy lens, CMS’ CY 2026 Physician Fee Schedule final rule fact sheet is a good high-level map of what’s changing and why. It can also help to keep an eye on HHS’ running resource page, Telehealth policy updates, especially when you’re trying to understand whether something is permanent, temporary or simply extended again.

Physicians Practice’s Medicare coverage can be useful context for how these rules evolved and why practices sometimes get tripped up by old habits. For example, “Meeting Medicare requirements to report telehealth services” is still a helpful operational explainer, and “Changes to Medicare telehealth services for CY 2024” can help teams understand how quickly the definitions and lists can shift.


Why do commercial payer rules make telehealth profitability feel unpredictable?


Because commercial coverage and payment policies vary across states, across insurers and even across different plans under the same insurer. That’s why a practice can run the same visit the same way and get paid differently depending on who the patient’s coverage is with. One of the most practical ways to control that chaos is to build and maintain a simple internal “telehealth payer grid” that spells out what each major payer expects in terms of eligible modalities, place-of-service rules, modifiers and any odd documentation requirements. The state-level view is well captured in the Center for Connected Health Policy’s scan, State Telehealth Laws and Reimbursement Policies Report (Fall 2025), and MGMA has also discussed the uncertainty practices have navigated as the so-called telehealth cliff has softened, including in “Bridging strategic uncertainty as the ‘telehealth cliff’ is replaced by firm ground”.


Where do practices usually lose money on telehealth?


Not always in the reimbursement rate itself. More often, the margin gets chewed up by friction. A telehealth program that looks fine on paper can become expensive when the process is inconsistent, when no-shows are high, when staff are constantly converting visits because patients can’t get connected, or when documentation and billing aren’t standardized. That’s why telehealth profitability is oddly tied to basic access operations. If your schedule is leaking appointments through cancellations and empty slots, it’s hard to make any visit type financially strong. Physicians Practice has a business-minded take on the revenue impact of cancellations in “Turning patient cancellations into revenue”, and a broader access angle in “Patient access myths specialty practices should ditch today”. Even older process stories can be useful as operational models; for example, “Atrius Health deploys home-based Covid-19 triage call center” is a reminder that tight triage rules and clean routing matter when you’re trying to protect both clinician time and revenue.


What compliance issue can blow up telehealth profitability the fastest?


Audit risk, repayments and enforcement actions. Telehealth has been a persistent area of interest for regulators, and the financial downside comes quickly when documentation doesn’t support what was billed or when a practice’s policies don’t match what payers and regulators expect. Physicians Practice has covered the post-pandemic landscape and fraud concerns in “Examining post-pandemic telehealth fraud risks”. Privacy and security also remain foundational; Physicians Practice walks through practical risk considerations in “Managing the risks of telemedicine”, while HHS offers the official baseline in HIPAA and Telehealth.


What if our clinicians prescribe controlled substances via telemedicine?


That’s an area where you want to be extra disciplined because federal policy has been evolving and extensions have been issued. A good habit is to keep an eye on primary sources as they’re released, such as this DEA press release and the associated Federal Register notice. For operations, the key is having a written internal policy that addresses identity verification, licensure, PDMP checks, documentation expectations and follow-up rules, then training staff and auditing your own work so you catch problems before someone else does.


What should we watch each month to know if telehealth is really paying off?


Keep the dashboard simple enough that it actually gets reviewed. Practices typically learn the most from tracking no-show rate for virtual visits, denial rate for telehealth claims, the lag between the visit and claim submission, net collection rate and how many staff “touches” it takes to get a telehealth visit from scheduling to a clean claim. If you want broader workflow thinking that ties into telehealth, Physicians Practice’s Physician Productivity hub can be a useful companion.


What’s the quickest way to improve telehealth margin without a giant project?


Look for one recurring point of friction and fix it quickly. Sometimes that’s tightening your visit types so telehealth isn’t the default dumping ground for anything “quick.” Sometimes it’s standardizing documentation so coding and billing are consistent. Sometimes it’s addressing cancellations and empty slots so the schedule stops leaking revenue. And sometimes it’s a compliance sweep of your platform, vendor contracts and policies so you’re not building growth on top of shaky risk assumptions.

Telehealth doesn’t have to be a margin killer. But it also can’t be treated like an informal convenience that lives inside your schedule. The practices that keep it profitable are the ones that make the work predictable, the billing repeatable and the risk manageable.


Medical Office Supplies



Medical and Rx Pads


 Billing and Collection Supplies



 

Business Cards and Stationary



 

Chart Labels



Tuesday, September 3, 2024

The interaction model vs. the holistic model in telehealth

Any discussion of the future of telehealth must delineate between the different telehealth models—notably, the one-time-visit and the holistic model. Note that these names are not technical industry terms but helpful ways of illustrating how a provider offers telehealth services to its members.

Most telehealth services fall within this one-time-visit model. In these cases, telehealth acts as a stopgap and does not replace the primary care physician (PCP) and other clinician providers. Rather, it is a means of solving medical issues on a one-time basis. Much like an urgent care visit, the virtual physician does not take full control or responsibility for medical care; instead, they address what they can within a single, isolated visit. Since the pandemic, patients have become accustomed to the one-time-visit model. Thus, they treat telehealth as a virtual urgent care visit, drawing a hard line between the purpose of their brick-and-mortar PCP and telehealth services.

Unfortunately, there are many problems with the one-time-visit approach, one of which is that care continuity is simply impossible. Patients meet with different and unfamiliar doctors and other clinicians each visit, decreasing their willingness to comply with care and impairing the quality-of-care outcomes.


A holistic approach to telehealth



Unlike the one-time-visit model used by many telehealth companies, which specialize in treating only one individual chronic disease, the holistic approach allows for true primary care that treats the whole patient and addresses all their health concerns, including managing multiple chronic conditions. This approach sees care as a complete, long-term relationship with the patient instead of siloed, one-time visits or exchanges. As a result, patients are more willing to comply with treatment plans, and the provider has greater alignment with the outcomes of the member or patient, forming a deeper patient-physician relationship.

An ideal holistic model will also provide multifactorial virtual care. In other words, the patient isn’t restricted to one means of communication but can use multiple means, whether synchronous video, asynchronous chat, email, phone call, etc. By using many forms of communication to support virtual care, providers offer greater accessibility to patients.


Payviders and holistic telehealth


If the holistic approach to telehealth is superior to the one-time-visit model, why haven’t more companies embraced it? The culture and structure of many businesses – particularly health insurance companies – make it difficult to adopt a holistic style of telehealth.

However, within a payvider model, the holistic approach to telehealth flows naturally. A payvider is a health care entity that delivers care services and handles financial elements as well. It often manifests as an insurance company that provides access to physicians and doctors. Payviders have mechanisms that allow their physicians to take full responsibility for the health care process, e.g., following up on lab tests or X-rays. Physicians operating in a one-time-visit telehealth model might not have those same incentives.

Not only does a payvider have the culture and tools to deliver holistic telehealth, but it also incentivizes greater alignment of interests with patients. In the general health care system today, there is little (if any) alignment of interest between all involved parties. But, because the patient is the payvider’s direct client, there is a real motivation to have the highest quality of care at the lowest cost.


Additional benefits of telehealth through a payvider


When a virtual-first payvider delivers telehealth, it increases accessibility and convenience for the member without creating a siloed, one-time-visit-based style of care. Consider that an urgent-care-type telehealth model focuses exclusively on a singular patient’s issue – say, diabetes, for instance. However, if the patient is experiencing multiple health issues at once, the telehealth physician will recommend they see their family doctor or PCP.

In the real world, people usually have multiple health issues. For example, if someone has diabetes, there is a high chance they also have high blood pressure. If a person has an injury that prevents them from working, they may develop anxiety or depression. During a telehealth visit with a payvider, a patient’s physician will address all or as many health issues as possible rather than one at once.


What technologies enable the holistic model?


Advanced technologies enable a holistic telehealth approach to flourish. Consider that continuity of care, a staple of holistic telehealth, requires routine touchpoints with the same clinicians and doctor. Technology facilitates interactions between patients and doctors, making those key touchpoints more accessible and frequent.

For example, a payvider can send the patient follow-up intakes to fill out regularly, whether for their blood sugar levels or mental health score. This data allows the clinician to track trends in care and see what is happening between visits. Similarly, remote monitoring tools, such as pulse oximeters, heart rate monitors, or glucose meters, enable the physician to manage the patient’s chronic conditions proactively.

Other notable technologies that enable the holistic telehealth model include decision-support systems powered by virtual assistants. These virtual assistants use generative artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) to automate the pre-screening process, gathering information from the patient, including the reason for their telehealth visit and symptoms.

The virtual assistants will also ask broader health-related questions, such as whether the person has a history of hypertension, diabetes, mental health issues, etc., and then churn that data through ML algorithms to determine if the patient might be at risk, notifying the doctor of the findings.


Preparing for the hybrid health care paradigm


Contrary to the rumblings in the news might imply, telehealth and virtual care are here to stay. Virtual-first payviders, uniquely, are already well-positioned to deliver holistic telehealth. Nevertheless, for other providers to maximize the effectiveness of telehealth and ensure the highest care outcomes for patients, they must move away from a one-time-visit model to a holistic approach. At the same time, physicians and other clinicians must prepare accordingly for this new hybrid health care paradigm, seamlessly integrating the virtual with the physical.

15% Off Medical Practice Supplies


VIEW ALL



Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Yellow)


Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Bright Orange)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Yellow)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Blue)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - White)


VIEW ALL




Tuesday, February 6, 2024

Telehealth: A lifeline in healthcare deserts

All across the United States today, there are massive medical deserts. These are remote areas of rural America where the closest hospital could be up to hours away. For most healthy individuals, this is a minor inconvenience without much bearing on their day-to-day lives. For those who suffer from chronic illnesses that require frequent hospitalization or services and treatments that are unavailable at their local physician’s office, however, these figurative medical deserts can be just as difficult to traverse as any stretch of the Sahara. These rural hospitals do their best to provide care for patients who may be coming from as far as hundreds of miles in every direction, but they are in desperate need of the support required to extend their care outside of hospital walls and into these isolated communities. How, then, do we rectify this issue and provide an oasis for patients lost to the Great American Medical Desert?

Telemedicine and mobile health care have come a long way in solving many of our health care system's issues today. Agencies and services have been mobilized in order to bring high-acuity health care right to front doors and living rooms. With the help of acute home care models and outpatient-at-home programs, many patients who otherwise would have been caught in a cycle of release and re-hospitalization can now enjoy the highest levels of care possible in the comfort of their homes. This not only improves the quality of life and outlook for the patient but also the results. Patients with access to in-home medical care have been shown to be overwhelmingly more likely to adhere to treatment plans. With the advent of online pharmacies and their rise in popularity and availability, patients who use these services can now have their prescriptions filled and delivered directly to their doors and, as a result, are far less likely to suffer any disruptions in their medication schedules. Patients who have undergone virtual and in-home care are more comfortable and at ease in their care, experience higher levels of engagement with their own personal health, and have higher physical and mental health test scores, by and large.

Telemedicine and mobile health care are not just making health care more convenient and efficient for patients but for hospitals and medical facilities, as well. In an era when hospitals and medical facilities are reporting longer wait times, increases in instances of doctor burnout, and dire staffing shortages, these services are relieving some of the burden. Medical technologies now allow doctors to monitor and track vitals remotely and provide them with actionable insight that can better assist them in crafting personalized treatment plans and prescribing medications to patients. In addition to virtual care, in-home mobile clinicians can now bring hospital care outside of hospital walls and expand their reach into the community. Caregivers can see more patients, provide more comprehensive and direct treatment, and free up hospital resources to better care for those who still require the level of care and treatment that only a hospital environment can provide them.

Telehealth and mobile health care services may never be able to entirely replicate the care and supervision that only a hospital setting can provide, but these services can be instrumental in helping patients with limited access to hospitals and medical facilities acquire high-acuity care. The continued development and adoption of virtual and in-home care services allow those caught in these medical deserts to not only receive treatment but do so comfortably and conveniently, which should be a right for all Americans regardless of where in the country they live. These services also provide much-needed relief to an overburdened health care system. Those who do need to travel great distances to hospitals will find that they operate more efficiently. Wait times will be reduced, doctors and nurses will be more present and available, and the overall quality of the care they are provided will be improved. As more health agencies and hospitals cultivate telehealth and mobile health care presences in previously underserved communities, the more accessible, efficient, and effective our health care system will become, and the better served patients across the country will be.

15% Off Medical Practice Supplies


VIEW ALL



Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Yellow)


Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Bright Orange)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Yellow)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Blue)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - White)


VIEW ALL





Monday, September 11, 2023

Expanding telehealth in rural areas

While those who live in major metropolitan areas across the U.S. have quick, reliable access to hospitals and health care providers, people residing in rural communities often lack the ability to find easily accessible clinicians and health care facilities and services. According to a post on Americanprogress.org, even though only 14% of Americans live in rural areas, these communities represent 67% of the nation’s primary care health professional shortages. In these rural communities, residents are disadvantaged not only by place and class, but low-income rural people of color are also disadvantaged by race.

The COVID-19 pandemic starkly illustrated the urban-rural divide in American health care, as many hospitals serving rural areas have closed recently. Some of the reasons include low patient volume, workforce shortages, budget cuts, and a move toward outpatient care. Not coincidentally, rural areas have also seen deaths from conditions like heart and lung diseases increase significantly.

Yet according to a post on USNews.com, these health care issues present opportunities for innovation. Alan Morgan, chief executive officer of the National Rural Health Association, said as much in a recent seminar: "Looking at rural communities, you really get a sense of where the country's going to be 10 to 20 years from now.” He pointed to past innovations such as the expansion of telemedicine, especially during the pandemic, as examples of that.

Virtual care has great potential to improve not only rural communities’ health, but also health equity. Clinicians can pre-screen patients virtually before sending them to a crowded facility, and can expedite telehealth appointments between city-based health care providers and patients in rural areas.

In an interview posted on HealthcareITnews.com, Shayan Vyas, senior vice president and medical director of hospital and health systems at Teledoc Health, said he was optimistic about virtual care’s potential to address and improve rural health care access. In particular, he expressed enthusiasm for the “hub and spoke” model of telehealth, which he described as a system “where hospitals and health systems can partner to bring specialist care closer to those who live in rural and underserved communities.”

He expanded on that as follows:“Rather than requiring patients to travel to a health system's hub where most specialists are—or have clinicians travel to rural clinics to see patients—we work with them to enable their clinics within rural communities with virtual care capabilities, so patients may remain within their local community while still accessing specialists they would have had to travel often hours to see.”

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, in partnership with the University of San Francisco, produced a report to assist those working to improve health, well-being, and equity in rural America. The report listed the following recommendations to advance rural health equity:
  • Make long-term economic and community development the focus of any strategy to support rural health equity by targeting rural areas with extreme poverty.
  • Focus on addressing systemic racism in rural areas through strategies that provide economic opportunities for rural people of color.
  • Invest in educational opportunities for all rural residents, particularly people of color and those living in poverty.
  • Ensure all rural residents have reliable internet access to support education, employment, telemedicine, and community participation.
  • Increase opportunities for Indigenous, Black, and Latino/Hispanic residents by encouraging them to vote and offering universal mail-in ballots in every state.
  • Invest in various means of transportation such as rural car sharing
  • Build and maintain rural clinics.

It’s clear that having the right tools and technology can help ensure sustainable quality in medical transports—often necessary in rural areas—and this can dramatically benefit hospitals and other facilities in terms of patient outcomes and overall costs. Dr. Richard Watson, co-founder of the health IT vendor Motient, emphasized in a recent interview with Healthcare IT News the growing importance not only of telehealth, but “the tools to enable data analysis around the personality of rural facilities.”

He went on to say that such technology will reveal the health patterns in such communities and allow residents to remain closer to home for their care, while at the same time enabling providers to “find the answer to quality and sustainability questions.” Further, he believes that payers need to reexamine reimbursement models in rural areas and understand that quality metrics and edicts do not apply.

“All of the geographic and demographic offsets will do little to counterbalance that,” he said. “It seems the current reimbursement schema allows rural facilities to barely keep their heads above water.”

In addition to better use of technology, staff shortages in rural hospitals and clinics can be amended by identifying students in those communities and enticing them to consider training that includes working in a rural setting rather than in a big city. And policies that help to offset the costs of medical and dental education can also help to expand the health care workforce. With the expansion of telemedicine during the pandemic and beyond, both the federal government and individual states are working to expand this technology and other tools to help ensure rural communities have access to the vital care they require.


15% Off Medical Practice Supplies


VIEW ALL



Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Yellow)


Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Bright Orange)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Yellow)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Blue)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - White)


VIEW ALL