Showing posts with label neurology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label neurology. Show all posts

Thursday, November 12, 2020

COVID-19 Diagnosis at Stroke Onset Linked to Worse Outcomes

A recently published analysis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) data from more than 1400 patients with stroke offers a new view of outcome predictors for this closely watched patient population.1

All told, the data suggest that having COVID-19 at onset of stroke is associated with more than twice the rate of mortality of other patients with stroke and worse outcomes, as well as that individuals of Asian descent may be at higher risk of COVID-19-associated strokes than other groups.

"Our findings suggest that in some people, COVID-19 may influence stroke risk through its effect on excessive blood clotting or inflammation, and may also influence the characteristics and outcome of the stroke, including greater severity with a higher chance of multiple large vessel blood clots,” said study investigator David Werring, PhD, professor and consultant neurologist, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, in a statement.2

Werring added that the data offer support for testing individuals for COVID-19 when they present to the hospital with a stroke, and noted that “further research is needed to determine whether treatments (such as the use of early full dose anticoagulation) should differ depending on this test result.”

With a knowledge gap related to characteristics and outcomes of stroke in patients with COVID-19, Werring and team of colleagues from the University College of London sought to provide clinicians with an updated overview of trends in this area. The (Service Evaluation of The Impact of COVID-19 On Stroke (SETICOS) project, which is currently being conducted in 13 stroke centers in England and Scotland, was designed to fill this hole.


Using data from SETICOS, investigators created a case-control study with patients admitted for stroke between March 9 and July 5, 2020. From a search of this time period, investigators identified 86 patients with stroke and evidence of COVID-19 at time of onset. For their analysis, investigators compared the characteristics and outcomes of these patients to those of the 1384 stroke patients admitted during the same time period without evidence of COVID-19.

Of the 86 patients with strokes and COVID-19, 81 were ischemic strokes and 5 were intracerebral hemorrhages. This group had a median age of 74.5 years (range, 67–84), and 54.7% were men, 71.6% were white, 9.5% were black, and 17.6% were Asian. Of the 1834 stroke patients in the control group, 1193 ischemic strokes and 191 were intracerebral hemorrhages. This group had a median age of 73 years (range, 61–82), 52.8% were men, 82.3% were white, 9.1% were black, and 7.3% were Asian.

In comparison to controls with ischemic stroke, those with ischemic stroke and COVID-19 were more likely to have multiple large vessel occlusions (17.9% vs 8.1%; P <.03) and were more severe (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score, 8 vs 5; P <.002).

Additionally, those with COVID-19 and ischemic stroke were associated with higher log10 D-dimer levels (COVID-19: 3.4; controls: 3.0; P <.01), as well as higher variance (standard deviation 0.83 vs. 0.63; P <.03), indicating there was a broader distribution of D-dimers in those with COVID-19. As well, those with COVID-19 were associated with more severe disability on discharge (median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, 4 vs 3; P <.0001) and inpatient death (19.8% vs 9.6%; P <.0001).

Additionally, in the 44 instances in which ischemic stroke and COVID-19 were present with both symptom onset dates recorded, COVID-19-relevant symptoms—fever, cough, or dyspnea—occurred a median of 6 days before the stroke onset. For the 3 individuals with intracerebral hemorrhage who had both dates recorded, the COVID-19 symptoms occurred a median of 4 days after the stroke onset. “Although the numbers are small, the difference between these two medians was significant (P <.002),” Werring et al. wrote.

With regard to outcomes, 19.8% of ischemic strokes among patients with COVID-19 resulted in death compared to 9.6% of patients in the control group (P <.00003). Additionally, the investigators pointed out that the recurrence of stroke during admission was very rare among those with COVID-19 (2.3%) and the control group (1.0%).

“By comparing characteristics and outcomes of strokes experienced by people with and without COVID-19, we found that there were differences between the groups, suggesting that COVID-19 exerts an influence over the presentation of stroke,” added Richard Perry, PhD, neurologist, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, in the aforementioned statement.2 "Some of the differences relate to what other studies are uncovering about COVID-19, in that it might make blood stickier and more likely to clot.”


REFERENCES

1. Perry RJ, Smith CJ, Roffe C, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19-associated stroke: a UK multicentre case-control study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Published November 5, 2020. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-324927

2. COVID-19 linked to worse stroke outcomes. News release. University College London. November 5, 2020. Accessed November 9, 2020. https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-11/ucl-clt110520.php

 



20% Off Medical Practice Supplies


VIEW ALL



Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Yellow)


Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Bright Orange)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Yellow)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Blue)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - White)


VIEW ALL

Wednesday, October 21, 2020

Improving the elective surgery backlog caused by the pandemic

The surgical backlog caused by COVID-19 gives us the opportunity to take a step back and ask: “is surgery really the best course of action for all of these patients?”


COVID-19 found the world ill-equipped to face the rigors of a global health crisis. Nobody quite knew how to brace for the novel health threat, and the pandemic has had far-reaching implications for individuals, families, businesses, and communities alike. That said, the healthcare industry should be driving the standard for safe, efficient, and customer-centered experiences in the wake of unexpected challenges like the COVID-19 crisis, but it’s not. We know the system and we know the stakes, and still, our most vulnerable populations continue to face even steeper barriers to the care they need.

Other industries, most notably financial services and education, were able to quickly adapt operations to meet evolving customer demands at an uncertain time. Healthcare, despite a quick move to telehealth for some delivery of care, has been less effective at managing the transition to socially distant service delivery for all who need it. Nowhere is this more evident than in the elective surgery backlog.

To limit the spread of the novel coronavirus—and to preserve critical resources at a critical time—many states enacted a temporary ban on elective surgery from March through May 2020. It was an important step that saved lives, but it also resulted in a three-month backlog of uncompleted procedures and a persistent backlog of surgeries that continue to be delayed. Further, many who were waiting for procedures at the start of the pandemic are still not comfortable returning to healthcare settings.


Healthcare providers and patients know that elective does not mean unimportant or unnecessary. In fact, a significant number of backlogged surgeries are for patients struggling with musculoskeletal conditions and chronic pain. Individuals with mobility issues who are already uniquely vulnerable to the pitfalls of a lingering pandemic are now forced to navigate unwieldy transportation systems, their own legitimate concerns about the safety of face-to-face interactions, and a healthcare system that was ill-equipped for a quick transition to remote services.

Similarly, a reluctance to adopt new technologies and approaches made healthcare uniquely vulnerable to the COVID-19 pandemic. As we look ahead to the coming flu season and its looming implications for an already strained healthcare system, we should also look ahead to the innovations that will propel our field forward and enable us to meet today’s challenges and beyond—and be unafraid to embrace them.

We must think about how we can deploy technological advancements to provide frictionless and customer-centric care. Patients are no longer just patients—they’re consumers who have increasingly come to expect on-demand digital experiences in healthcare, just as with all other industries. The healthcare industry largely lags behind, say, the banking industry, in its ability to consistently deliver on these expectations because it has failed to focus on howpatients experience health care.

It is possible to provide patients, or better say consumers, what they need despite the challenging times. We can close the elective surgery backlog. We can make it easier for patients to access the care they need, anytime and anywhere through virtual care.

Technology and innovation are the keys to help patients navigate complex conditions during COVID-19 and beyond.

Medical Practice Supplies


VIEW ALL



Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Yellow)


Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Bright Orange)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Pink)

Manual Prescription Pads (Light Yellow)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - Blue)

Manual Prescription Pad (Large - White)


VIEW ALL

.